Virginia Tech Criticized for Actions in Shooting
RICHMOND, Va., Aug. 30 - A state panel has sharply criticized decisions made by
Virginia Tech before and after last April's shooting massacre, saying university
officials could have saved lives by notifying students and faculty members
earlier about the killings on campus.
Because university officials misunderstood federal privacy laws as forbidding
any exchange of a student's mental health information, the panel's long-awaited
report concludes, they missed numerous indications of the gunman's mental health
After a judge ordered the gunman, Seung-Hui Cho, to receive outpatient mental health care for making suicidal
statements, Mr. Cho scheduled an appointment at the campus counseling center but
was given only a pre-appointment interview, the report said, and no follow-up
appointment occurred. Records of the interview are missing, and Mr. Cho's
parents were never informed by campus or local officials of his statements or
brief commitment to a mental health facility, the report said.
The panel, convened by Gov. Tim Kaine to investigate the April 16 shooting in
Blacksburg that left 33 people dead, including Mr. Cho, planned to release its
report on Thursday. Instead, it did so late Wednesday in reaction to being
informed that The New York Times had obtained a copy, according to an e-mail
from the governor's office.
Though the report's criticism was strong, it concluded that a campuswide
lockdown after the first shootings, a double homicide, would have been
impractical and probably ineffective in stopping Mr. Cho, 23.
"There does not seem to be a plausible scenario of a university response to
the double homicide that could have prevented the tragedy of considerable
magnitude on April 16," the report said. "Cho had started on a mission of
fulfilling a fantasy of revenge."
But if the university had issued an alert earlier or canceled classes after
Mr. Cho shot his first two victims, before moving on to shoot the rest in a
classroom building, the death toll might have been lower, the report said. It
found that even after university officials had learned the full scope of the
massacre, their messages to students played down the unfolding emergency as a
"routine police procedure."
"The events were highly disturbing and there was no way to sugarcoat them" in
disseminating the news, the report said. "Straight facts were needed."
Campus and local police responses were "well-coordinated," the report said,
but university police officers erred in prematurely concluding that their
initial lead in the double homicide was a good one. The police initially
believed the shooting was an isolated domestic dispute and erroneously pursued a
suspect who they thought had left the campus.
"They did not take sufficient action with what might happen if the initial
lead proved erroneous," said the report, which was written by an eight-member
panel that was led by W. Gerald Massengill, a former state police
superintendent, and included former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, as well as other mental health, security and education
In a raucous conference call with the governor's office on Wednesday night,
family members of victims voiced frustration that the university had not imposed
a lockdown after the first shootings and criticized the report for not demanding
that some officials be fired.
"Can you explain how 32 people were killed and no one has been fired, no one
has been held accountable at that university?" one family member on the
conference call asked.
"I can't answer that question," responded Larry Roberts, the chief counsel in
the governor's office, adding that panel members did not consider it their job
to make personnel recommendations.
The report, consisting of 147 pages and 14 appendices, said that while the
campus police knew of Mr. Cho's repeated instances of inappropriate behavior and
his stay at a mental health facility, that information never reached campus
workers who deal with troubled students. Contrary to what university officials
believed, the report said, federal privacy laws would have allowed them to
communicate some information about Mr. Cho's mental health problems among local,
state and campus security officials.
"Information privacy laws cannot help students if the law allows sharing, but
agency policy or practice forbids necessary sharing," it concludes. The report
also said "passivity" and lack of resources had hampered local and campus mental
A spokesman for Virginia Tech said officials there had not received a copy of
the report and could not comment on it.
The panel said it found no clear explanation for why the gunman had selected
his first two victims in a dormitory before moving on to a classroom building.
While the report did not shed new light on Mr. Cho's motives, it traced his
violent fantasies to the 1999 shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado.
After that massacre, Mr. Cho's middle school teachers in Fairfax County, Va.,
observed suicidal and homicidal thoughts in his writings and recommended
psychiatric counseling, which he received. He also received medication in those
years for a short time, the report said.
The panel's findings come a week after the university released its own report
recommending ways to improve security and mental health systems.
Campus officials said they were leaving it to the governor's panel to
critique the university's handling of Mr. Cho as a student and the decisions
made by security officials in the emergency.
The release of the report, which was originally planned to occur last Monday
on the first day of the fall semester at Virginia Tech, has been repeatedly
delayed, and in recent weeks some victims' families have voiced frustrations at
being denied a representative on the panel.
Some relatives have expressed concern at the potential for bias in having
former law enforcement officials in charge of investigating decisions made by
law enforcement officials.
The panel initially struggled to obtain records of Mr. Cho's encounters with
the mental health system, but Mr. Kaine issued an executive order in June that
gave the group greater access to health and academic records that are protected
by privacy laws.
The report largely sidesteps the Second Amendment debate about access to guns
in the state and the nation. It cites "deep divisions in American society
regarding the ready availability of rapid-fire weapons and high-capacity
magazines," stating that this debate was beyond its scope.
The report commends Mr. Kaine for having closed the loophole that allowed
people like Mr. Cho, who had been mandated to receive outpatient mental health
treatment, to buy guns. But it says a change is still needed in the state legal
code to address the problem, and it calls for state legislation to establish
"the right of every institution of higher education in the commonwealth to
regulate the possession of firearms on campus if it so desires."
The report said Mr. Cho's purchase of two guns violated federal law because
he had been judged to be a danger to himself and ordered to undergo outpatient
mental health treatment.
"There is confusion on the part of universities as to what their rights are
for setting policy regarding guns on campus," it said, recommending that
Virginia require background checks for all firearms sales, including those at
The report said that in a paper in a middle-school English class Mr. Cho
indicated that he "wanted to repeat Columbine." He was sent to a psychiatrist,
who gave him a diagnosis of "selective mutism," or an anxiety-related refusal to
speak, and major depression. He was given a prescription for the anti-depressant
Paroxetine, which he took from June 1999 to July 2000, and "did quite well on
The doctor stopped the medication because Mr. Cho had improved.
In high school, after a teacher reported his barely audible voice to the
guidance office, Mr. Cho was placed in special education for speech and
emotional problems, which excused him from making oral presentations and
answering teachers' questions.
Despite Mr. Cho's diagnosis of mutism and his educational accommodations in
high school, when he applied to Virginia Tech, the university was never informed
nor did it ask about Mr. Cho's history, the report said.
It compliments the office of the chief medical examiner for its handling of
the autopsies and the identification of the dead, but said that communication
with families was "poorly handled."
The report said the state's procedures for providing professional staff
members to help families get information, crisis intervention and referrals to
other resources did not work.
The New York Times